Storytelling in Comparative Perspective: How to Compare Stories Without Flattening Them
Storytelling in Comparative Perspective examines how stories can be studied across cultures, periods, media, languages, religions, genres, and institutions without reducing them to one universal template. This article explains why comparison is useful but risky: similar motifs, plots, rituals, characters, journeys, floods, tricksters, transformations, or origin stories may serve very different social, ecological, political, theological, or historical purposes. It explores folklore classification, tale types, motifs, oral performance, myth, ritual, cosmology, comparative narratology, translation, transmission, media form, colonial archives, universal patterns, local meanings, and AI-assisted comparison. The article also warns against flattening, template capture, archive innocence, translation blindness, performance erasure, origin obsession, motif extraction, comparative ranking, and AI overconfidence. As part of the Storytelling series, it argues that responsible comparison should preserve source context, difference, protocol, local interpretation, evidence limits, and methodological humility across narrative traditions and public interpretation today.









